The Wall Street Journal, 24 Mar 2009
"Following is Dow Jones's statement on the ruling: "Dow Jones remains extremely disappointed with the Court's ruling against the company in November, and strongly disagrees with the Court's finding that the complained-of editorials and letter to the editor constitute contempt of court. It is regrettable that although the Court already imposed a fine against Dow Jones, the Attorney General still chose to pursue additional contempt charges. Melanie Kirkpatrick agreed not to reargue the Court's previous interpretation of the publications in order to resolve this matter in its entirety. But neither Ms. Kirkpatrick nor Dow Jones agrees with the substance of the charges or the contempt judgment. Dow Jones is committed to defending the right of The Wall Street Journal Asia to report and comment on matters of international importance, including matters concerning Singapore.""
Read More
