Yahoo! News Singapore, 12 Jun 2012Speaking to reporters after a round of closed pre-trial conferences on Monday, Subhas said he once again objected to the prosecution’s application for a gag order on the girl’s name in amended charges served on his clients.
“She (will have to testify) if they are going to trial,” he said.
“I objected to it [the gag order] on the basis that the provisions of the law do not protect people like her because she’s not a victim of rape or molest, and provisions do not apply,” he said.
The prosecution was required to serve amended charges on the accused men, adding the girl’s identity, as it was not disclosed initially. Full story
